Abstract:
The research aimed at describing the legal protection concept geographical indication in supporting the economic right of
geographical indication holders, the contribution of geographical indication in improving the prosperity of geographical
indication holders, and the legal protection of the economic rights of geographical indication about the use of a sign that
is similar to a registered geographical indication. This research encompasses the normative legal analysis and empirical
research methods. The first problem statement used the normative legal research method, which analyses how the legal
protection concept of geographical indication supports the economic rights of geographical indication holders. The
empirical research method was used for the second problem statement, which analyses how registered geographical
indication contributed to improving the prosperity of geographical indication holders and was also used for the third
problem, which analyses the legal protection of the economic rights of geographical indication holders about the use of a
sign that is similar a registered geographical indication. The research results indicate the following: (1) the legal
protection concept of geographical indication that is integrated into the law of trademark and geographical indication has
not supported the economic rights of geographical indication holders, either from the substance aspect or with regards to
the stipulated legal sanction; (2) the economic rights of geographical indication holder relation to production monopoly
right, sign use, and product marketing has not contributed to the improvement of their prosperity; (3) the legal protection
of the economic rights of geographical indication holders about the use of a sign that is similar to a registered
geographical indication is still weak, both in the private and public legal enforcement aspects.