Abstract:
This study aims to determine: 1) The application of criminal sanctions against the delivery of
misleading information that results in consumer losses in electronic transactions in criminal
case number 650/Pid.Sus./2020/PN.Mks; 2) The judge's legal considerations in imposing a
criminal decision on the delivery of misleading information that results in consumer losses in
electronic transactions in decision number 650/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.Mks
The research method of the research is descriptive qualitative research by conducting
interviews with related parties who handle these cases. The results of the study shows that: 1)
The application of criminal sanctions against the delivery of misleading information that results
in consumer losses in electronic transactions in the decision of case number
650/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.Mks has not shown a sense of justice for consumers (victims), because it
only uses one statutory provision. 2) The judge's legal considerations in imposing a criminal
decision on the delivery of misleading information that results in consumer losses in electronic
transactions in decision number 650/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.Mk
