Abstract:
This research aims to find out: Whether the criminal conviction in the verdict number 1812 /
Pid.B / 2019/ PN.Mks has been in accordance with the value of public justice and how the
judge's consideration in sentencing criminal convictions in verdict number 1812 / Pid.B / 2019
/ PN.Mks.
This research method is an qualitative normative research method. The types of data used are
premier data and secondary data. Data collection techniques conduct interviews with The
Judge of the State Court Class IA Makassar, and the Prosecutor of the Makassar State
Prosecutor and conduct a literature of legal references related to the case. The results of this
study show that the values of justice in the verdict No. 1812 / Pid.B / 2019 / Pn. have not
reflected a sense of justice for victims. Ideally the Public Prosecutor and the Panel of Judges
should also consider the provisions of the other articles, so that the verdict received by the
accused is very likely to be more severe. Although the main provision is detention, but before
committing the crime of detention, the accused is directly involved in the theft of goods from the
same victim. The judge's legal consideration in imposing a criminal light weight on the
perpetrator in the case of penal in the case of detention in the verdict Number: 1812 / Pid.B /
2019 / PN.Mks has considered juridically, sociologically, philosophically and also subjectively.
However, in that case the judge has not considered the crime of theft committed by the defendant
before committing the crime of detention, the defendant's actions have been detrimental to the
victim and also the community who are restless about the behavior of theft and exposure. If this
becomes a consideration that can be incriminating for the defendant, it does not rule out the
possibility of imprisonment for the accused can be more than 8 (eight) months in prison