Abstract:
Purpose: The aim of this research is to determine the extent to which cross-conceptions in
intellectual property rights can be resolved, and ultimately can be used to support efforts to record the legality of rights both individually and communally. The next goal is to encourage communal intellectual property to become a regional tourism commodity.
Theoritical Reference: Theoretically, Intellectual Property Rights have an individual and
personal nature, while communal intellectual property actually has a communal nature. So, placing communal intellectual property rules into intellectual property rights law brings about theoretical confusion.
Method: The research method used uses a doctrinal approach by collecting data through
literature study and then presenting it. Data were analyzed descriptively.
Result and conclusion: This study found: the fact that IPR legislation in Indonesia places
communally owned objects into IPR legislation, such as the inclusion of Geographical Indications containing Communal Intellectual Property in the Trademark and Geographical Indications Law, which is actually a statutory regulation. IPR invitation (personal). Likewise, the further impact is the weak potential for utilizing economic rights in the form of loss of potential tourism commodities, especially regional tourism. It is concluded that there is equalization of intellectual property legal institutions, namely the incorporation of communal intellectual property objects into intellectual property legislation. Even though this equality does not constitute equal distribution of legal principles, the resulting legal consequences weaken the economic influence of a commodity. Optimizing the economic potential of communal intellectual property, especially to support regional tourism development, will be disrupted.
Research Implication: This research has implications for harmonization of the principles of
intellectual property law so that they can be applied in the development of economic rights, especially in the tourism sector.
Originality/value: This research is something new because it not only looks at conflicting
conceptions in the regulation of intellectual property rights, but synergizes with legal benefit factors, namely the economic impact of tourism that can be achieved if.
